Apache HTTP Server Version 2.2
Some hints and tips on security issues in setting up a web server. Some of the suggestions will be general, others specific to Apache.
The Apache HTTP Server has a good record for security and a developer community highly concerned about security issues. But it is inevitable that some problems -- small or large -- will be discovered in software after it is released. For this reason, it is crucial to keep aware of updates to the software. If you have obtained your version of the HTTP Server directly from Apache, we highly recommend you subscribe to the Apache HTTP Server Announcements List where you can keep informed of new releases and security updates. Similar services are available from most third-party distributors of Apache software.
Of course, most times that a web server is compromised, it is not because of problems in the HTTP Server code. Rather, it comes from problems in add-on code, CGI scripts, or the underlying Operating System. You must therefore stay aware of problems and updates with all the software on your system.
In typical operation, Apache is started by the root user, and it
switches to the user defined by the
User directive to serve hits. As is the
case with any command that root executes, you must take care that it is
protected from modification by non-root users. Not only must the files
themselves be writeable only by root, but so must the directories, and
parents of all directories. For example, if you choose to place
/usr/local/apache then it is suggested that
you create that directory as root, with commands like these:
mkdir bin conf logs
chown 0 . bin conf logs
chgrp 0 . bin conf logs
chmod 755 . bin conf logs
It is assumed that
/usr/local are only modifiable by root. When you install the
httpd executable, you should ensure that it is
cp httpd /usr/local/apache/bin
chown 0 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd
chgrp 0 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd
chmod 511 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd
You can create an htdocs subdirectory which is modifiable by other users -- since root never executes any files out of there, and shouldn't be creating files in there.
If you allow non-root users to modify any files that root either
executes or writes on then you open your system to root compromises.
For example, someone could replace the
httpd binary so
that the next time you start it, it will execute some arbitrary code. If
the logs directory is writeable (by a non-root user), someone could replace
a log file with a symlink to some other system file, and then root
might overwrite that file with arbitrary data. If the log files
themselves are writeable (by a non-root user), then someone may be
able to overwrite the log itself with bogus data.
Server Side Includes (SSI) present a server administrator with several potential security risks.
The first risk is the increased load on the server. All SSI-enabled files have to be parsed by Apache, whether or not there are any SSI directives included within the files. While this load increase is minor, in a shared server environment it can become significant.
SSI files also pose the same risks that are associated with CGI
scripts in general. Using the
exec cmd element, SSI-enabled
files can execute any CGI script or program under the permissions of the
user and group Apache runs as, as configured in
There are ways to enhance the security of SSI files while still taking advantage of the benefits they provide.
Enabling SSI for files with
extensions can be dangerous. This is especially true in a shared, or high
traffic, server environment. SSI-enabled files should have a separate
extension, such as the conventional
.shtml. This helps keep
server load at a minimum and allows for easier management of risk.
Another solution is to disable the ability to run scripts and
programs from SSI pages. To do this replace
IncludesNOEXEC in the
Options directive. Note that users may
<--#include virtual="..." --> to execute CGI
scripts if these scripts are in directories designated by a
First of all, you always have to remember that you must trust the writers of the CGI scripts/programs or your ability to spot potential security holes in CGI, whether they were deliberate or accidental. CGI scripts can run essentially arbitrary commands on your system with the permissions of the web server user and can therefore be extremely dangerous if they are not carefully checked.
All the CGI scripts will run as the same user, so they have potential to conflict (accidentally or deliberately) with other scripts e.g. User A hates User B, so he writes a script to trash User B's CGI database. One program which can be used to allow scripts to run as different users is suEXEC which is included with Apache as of 1.2 and is called from special hooks in the Apache server code. Another popular way of doing this is with CGIWrap.
Allowing users to execute CGI scripts in any directory should only be considered if:
Limiting CGI to special directories gives the admin control over what goes into those directories. This is inevitably more secure than non script aliased CGI, but only if users with write access to the directories are trusted or the admin is willing to test each new CGI script/program for potential security holes.
Most sites choose this option over the non script aliased CGI approach.
Embedded scripting options which run as part of the server itself,
mod_python, run under the identity of the server itself
User directive), and
therefore scripts executed by these engines potentially can access anything
the server user can. Some scripting engines may provide restrictions, but
it is better to be safe and assume not.
To run a really tight ship, you'll want to stop users from setting
.htaccess files which can override security features
you've configured. Here's one way to do it.
In the server configuration file, put
This prevents the use of
.htaccess files in all
directories apart from those specifically enabled.
One aspect of Apache which is occasionally misunderstood is the feature of default access. That is, unless you take steps to change it, if the server can find its way to a file through normal URL mapping rules, it can serve it to clients.
For instance, consider the following example:
# cd /; ln -s / public_html
This would allow clients to walk through the entire filesystem. To work around this, add the following block to your server's configuration:
Deny from all
This will forbid default access to filesystem locations. Add
Directory blocks to
allow access only in those areas you wish. For example,
Allow from all
Allow from all
Also be wary of playing games with the
UserDir directive; setting it to
./ would have the same effect, for root, as
the first example above. If you are using Apache 1.3 or above, we strongly
recommend that you include the following line in your server
UserDir disabled root
To keep up-to-date with what is actually going on against your server you have to check the Log Files. Even though the log files only reports what has already happened, they will give you some understanding of what attacks is thrown against the server and allow you to check if the necessary level of security is present.
A couple of examples:
grep -c "/jsp/source.jsp?/jsp/ /jsp/source.jsp??" access_log
grep "client denied" error_log | tail -n 10
The first example will list the number of attacks trying to exploit the Apache Tomcat Source.JSP Malformed Request Information Disclosure Vulnerability, the second example will list the ten last denied clients, for example:
[Thu Jul 11 17:18:39 2002] [error] [client foo.example.com] client denied
by server configuration: /usr/local/apache/htdocs/.htpasswd
As you can see, the log files only report what already has happened, so
if the client had been able to access the
.htpasswd file you
would have seen something similar to:
foo.example.com - - [12/Jul/2002:01:59:13 +0200] "GET /.htpasswd HTTP/1.1"
in your Access Log. This means you probably commented out the following in your server configuration file:
<Files ~ "^\.ht">
Deny from all